Response to “This is NOT a CON CON!”…Geez! She doesn’t have to yell…
Tuesday, August 4th, 2009I received 2 interesting “comments” today that I am going to share with you by pasting the verbiage from Sandra Yeager’s rant at me about my posts on her letter sending out a rallying cry to “her churches”. Below is the ‘comment’ that she posted to BOTH of my blog articles “Fellow Christians?“ and “Con Con”:
“My name is Sandra Yeager. I am the state coordinator of the We the People Foundation that drafted the church letter up for discussion. This letter was sent to my church affiliates to notify them of the Continental Congress 2009, which is being held in November to grant us all relief from any law that violates our liberty and the Constitution. The We the People Foundation has filed numerous lawsuits against our government for the past twenty years for violating the constitution. We have served the government with eighteen (18) petitions for redress for grievances since 1995, not just since the election.
A Continental Congress has only taken place once in history, in 1774. It’s time to do it again. The first one gave us our founding documents which gave us the experience of freedom like the world has never known. The next one in November of this year has the sole purpose of holding the governmental accountable to the people for their violations of the Constitution. We are reaching out to constitutional scholars all over America. Their religious status is not a qualification. These delegates will be nominated and elected by the people of their state.
As my alleged hate letter clearly states, if you know someone that is a constitutional scholar, please nominate them on the website to be a delegate. I have strict religious beliefs, as does my church. In America, that is our right. It’s called freedom of religion. I also have a right to send an email to my church affiliates about my thoughts, it’s called free speech. The same 1st amendment right allows you to scrutinize my letter. Isn’t freedom wonderful? We live in a country like none other, and we need to keep it that way. If we don’t agree, we can just disagree.
A Constitutional Convention is a convention called by members of Congress (government elected officials) to change or amend the constitution. We definitely do not want any part of that, nor are we members of Congress that would have any authority to do so. We believe our founding documents are already perfect, and us religious extremists even go as far as to say they were endowed by our Creator.
Our intentions are very well explained in this slide show presentation:
<a title=”View CC2009 is Your Civic Duty on Scribd” href=”http://www.scribd.com/doc/17599422/CC2009-is-Your-Civic-Duty” style=”margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;”>CC2009 is Your Civic Duty <object codebase=”http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0″ id=”doc_414064834516605″ name=”doc_414064834516605″ classid=”clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000″ align=”middle”height=”500″ width=”100%” ><param name=”movie”value=”http://d.scribd.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=17599422&access_key=key-4mkfm7ro0aavo4hiexu&page=1&version=1&viewMode=”> <param name=”quality” value=”high”> <param name=”play” value=”true”><param name=”loop” value=”true”> <param name=”scale” value=”showall”><param name=”wmode” value=”opaque”> <param name=”devicefont” value=”false”><param name=”bgcolor” value=”#ffffff”> <param name=”menu” value=”true”><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”> <param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always”> <param name=”salign” value=”"> <embed src=”http://d.scribd.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=17599422&access_key=key-4mkfm7ro0aavo4hiexu&page=1&version=1&viewMode=” quality=”high” pluginspage=”http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer” play=”true” loop=”true” scale=”showall” wmode=”opaque” devicefont=”false” bgcolor=”#ffffff” name=”doc_414064834516605_object” menu=”true” allowfullscreen=”true” allowscriptaccess=”always” salign=”" type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” align=”middle” height=”500″ width=”100%”></embed></object>
Finally, as this letter was not sent to any of you, please realize that there was no cramming down your throat intended. I certainly hope this clears things up. THIS IS NOT A CON-CON!
In Liberty,
Sandra Yeager”
Alrrriiiighttyyy then! Phew! That clears it all up for me…how ’bout you???
Especially all that gobbley-gook in the middle. Of course I had to go to my number one “go-to”, Alex and below are the emails we had discussing this clarification:
a) This is classic CYA astroturfing.
b) Despite her claims, what is being proposed is a de facto ConCon,
and the groups associated with it are uniformly dominionist and
right-wing groups linked to “Christian patriot” militias (as noted in
previous mails).
c) That crap at the end is VERY poorly formed HTML, where they tried
to link to a document on Scribd which was again a CYA attempt to make
a de facto ConCon not seeming like a ConCon.
And furthermore….
It starts out by essentially claiming the government usurped its
authority including calls for “tea parties” (common in “Christian
patriot” circles), goes on to the “we are a republic, and not a
democracy” rant (more properly, the US as operates now IS a
representative democracy, rather than a direct democracy–up to and
including claiming the difference is that “democracy is two wolves and
a sheep voting for dinner, with a republic the sheep has a gun”),
calling for steeplejacking of government (from astroturfing city and
county council meetings to steeplejacking state political party
conventions to becoming “expert witnesses” in legislative committees
to explicit recruitment to join “Christian Patriot” militia orgs to
running for office), promotion of the wonderful “Patriot” bogosity
known as “jury nullification” (VERY widely promoted in “Christian
patriot” communities), claims straight out of Posse Comitatus
(claiming county sheriffs have more authority than the President), fun
with “State’s Rights” bogosity, claims that the government was
established as a Christian nation, Bircher claims that the entire US
government was essentially usurped by “bankers” at a “secret meeting”
in 1910 (not noted is that “bankers” has historically been a Bircher
codeword for the Jewish people)…pretty much this is the typical
“Christian Patriot” screed.
Okay…follow me on this…here is the “gobbly-gook that Sandra tried to post for us to clear things up:
As an aside, this is the document she tried to link to w/o success:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17599422/CC2009-is-Your-Civic-Duty
Since this is a slide show and not a video, you will have to click on the link to view this. So what she is trying to tell me is that this is simply a letter that was meant to go out to her church affiliations, not me, and that they are firm believers in the Constitution as it was created by our Founders.
The disparity comes in when you examine that they seek to right a wrong by correcting the perceived loss of constitutional freedoms. They also appear to have a true sense that there was an inherent joining of church and state in the name of the ‘c’hristian god that they have determined is the only path to salvation.
Given their coziness with ‘patriot militia’ ideologies, I think my next post will have to be a discussion of the vigilante activity of organized private militias such as the corporation formerly known as “Blackwater” – now known as “Xe”…
And the story continues…













